By use case
The handoffs run themselves.
Most internal delay is a person waiting to hear that something happened in another team's system.
What usually goes wrong
The gaps are predictable.
Not because the software is bad, but because each system only holds part of the story.
- 01Approvals sit in inboxes.
- 02Handoffs depend on someone remembering to send a message.
- 03Exceptions are handled by whoever notices first.
What changes
When the context is shared.
Triggers across products
An event in one product can start work in another without an integration project.
Approvals with a trail
Human approval steps are part of the workflow, with a record of who decided what.
Exceptions raised, not missed
Conditions that need a person are escalated deliberately.
The products this uses
In the order most companies switch them on.
You do not need all of them on day one. Each step is useful before the next one exists.
- 01Sarva AutomationVisual workflows with triggers, conditions, approvals and actions that reach across every product.Early access
- 02Sarva CRMA sales workspace for leads, accounts, opportunities and the daily work of moving deals forward.Early access
- 03Sarva ServiceOne inbox for email, WhatsApp, chat and social, with the customer's full history beside every message.Early access
- 04Sarva ERPQuotations, orders, invoices, payments, accounting, purchasing, inventory, projects and manufacturing.Available
- 05Sarva AIAn intelligence layer that reads the customer, the orders, the conversations and the numbers together.In development
Underneath all of it
Whichever products you use, they are working on one customer record.
One account · one document chain
Scroll horizontally to follow the chain →
Other solutions
Does this match how your business runs?
Tell us where the manual work sits today and we will be specific about which of these products would remove it, and which of them are not ready yet.